The Obsession Archivesgovernment's most important media regulator just sent a clear message to America's biggest wireless companies: Your free data streaming programs are a violation of net neutrality.
The question, though: Will it matter?
In letters to AT&T and Verizon sent Thursday, the Federal Communications Commission made it clear to the telecom giants that their free streaming programs are a violation of the rules put in place to ensure net neutrality.
It's the most aggressive stance yet against so-called "zero rating," in which people can stream certain content over their phone, without it counting against their data plans. While these programs are somewhat popular with consumers, they've also created concern that companies could use these programs to favor their own content, and force other companies to pay up.
These programs are seen as particularly crucial to the future of telecom and media, given how quickly consumers are adopting smartphones as platforms to stream data-intensive video.
The letters, which Mashableacquired from the FCC, detail how AT&T and Verizon are using their programs to create an unfair advantage, thus violating rules put in place to ensure the internet remains a level playing field for all companies and their customers.
Writing to AT&T, the FCC's head of its wireless telecoms bureau dropped the hammer. The regulator and the company had been in conversation over AT&T's sponsored data program.
[...] the Sponsored Data program strongly favors AT&T's own video offerings while unreasonably discriminating against unaffiliated edge providers and limiting their ability to offer competing video services to AT&T's broadband subscribers on a level playing field. We have therefore reached the preliminary conclusion that these practices inhibit competition, harm consumers, and interfere with the "virtuous cycle" needed to assure the continuing benefits of the Open Internet.
To Verizon, Wilkins was slightly kinder, but not by much.
[...] Verizon seems to be "acting in ways that may harm the open Internet, such as preferring [its] own or affiliated content [and] demanding fees from edge providers."
Both letters say the same thing—these programs give an unfair advantage to each companies' own content, while making other companies pay up for the same benefit. Think of AT&T and Verizon as toll roads that their company cars ride for free, but cost other companies to do the same.
The FCC has asked both AT&T and Verizon to respond by December 15.
The problem here: the FCC may be running out of time. AT&T and Verizon will almost certainly disagree with the FCC, and drag out any proceedings, and do so knowing that the FCC is in for a major overhaul under Donald Trump.
Once inaugurated, Trump will appoint five new FCC commissioners, including a chairperson. So far, all signs point to Trump picking someone likely to drastically roll back much of the net neutrality progress made by the current administration—including eliminating or seriously altering the Open Internet Order, the Obama-era FCC regulations roundly welcomed by net neutrality activists.
Knowing this, AT&T and Verizon could run out the clock on this issue, meaning: zero rating programs could end up a standard part of the wireless world.
FCC zero rating letter to Verizon by mashablescribd on Scribd
FCC zero rating letter to AT&T by mashablescribd on Scribd
Topics FCC Net Neutrality
Previous:A Low, Dishonest Decade
Woman's mirror selfie creates a mind'Black Panther' is already starting to eclipse 'The Avengers' at the box officeKim Kardashian and Kanye West to face the KarJenners on 'Family Feud'Chinese phone makers are building the allWe tried out the LG V30s and its AI'Catwoman' was a 's**t movie', says writer of 'Catwoman'Yes, the rumors are true. Girl Scout Cookie coffee is now a part of this world.Tesla is donating electric car chargers to select U.S. officesThe moon may get its own 4G network in 2019Russia reportedly tried to pin the Olympics hack on North KoreaMichelle Obama sets release date for her deeply personal autobiographyArctic warm event stuns scientists, as record warmth reaches North PoleManafort's PDF conversion confusion becomes evidence in Mueller probeHey Nokia, stop ruining our memoriesWhy the UK has set up a separate fund to further the Time's Up movementTesla is donating electric car chargers to select U.S. officesThe moon may get its own 4G network in 2019Samsung Galaxy S9 and S9+ U.S. prices: Verizon, AT&T, TThe moon may get its own 4G network in 2019Teachers say #ArmMeWith classroom resources instead of guns Fox News calls Jamie Lee Curtis a hypocrite for using guns in films Twitter: All emoji are now equal, character 'The Walking Dead' gift guide for superfans Facebook now says 30 million affected by hack, will notify users Trump announces economic advisers, and they're all named Steve Facebook removes hundreds of pages and accounts that spread fake news Time to talk about frog dissection on ‘American Horror Story: Apocalypse’ ‘American Horror Story: Apocalypse’ Episode 5 was the most brutal yet MSNBC throws shade at Trump's claim he watched 'nonexistent' video Does the timing of your Instagram post impact its performance? YouTube gives the boot to Partners who post 'duplicative content' Time's Up UK fund pays out £1M to combat sexual assault and harassment Google will oppose subpoena for user data in Shitty Media Men lawsuit Google's Mark Risher: We've never abused your 2FA data Banksy's self Indonesian president quotes 'Game of Thrones' in speech on world economy Photos taken after rocket failure prove spaceflight is never routine DuckDuckGo, the pro Kim Kardashian still doesn't consider herself a feminist Elon Musk denies being replaced by James Murdoch as Tesla chairman
2.7836s , 10130.671875 kb
Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【Obsession Archives】,Information Information Network