If you ask nearly all the world's climate scientists,Watch When the Camellia Blooms Online there's simply no debate: The planet is warming as amounts of greenhouse gases rise in the air -- and human activity is primarily to blame.
But Scott Pruitt, head of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, insists on debating climate change. And that debate, apparently, might be televised, Reuters reported on Tuesday.
SEE ALSO: Antarctic ice shelf crack is moving at record speeds, poised to cleave off massive iceberg any minuteDoubters of mainstream climate science, including Pruitt, argue that dissenting views haven't been heard by the scientific community. They falsely claim that plenty of questions still remain about the scientific evidence for human-caused global warming.
In reality, however, while there is uncertainty about how quickly and severely rising temperatures will affect the planet, there's virtually no doubt among climate scientists that climate change is happening -- and that it's happening because of us.
By calling for a debate, Pruitt creates a false narrative that casts his critics as stubborn, inflexible bullies who are hell-bent on destroying the fossil fuel industry. In this scenario, climate scientists and their allies are jealously guarding the climate discussion. Why don't other folks, like coal company executives, get to have a say?
Rather than inform the public, all this does is cast clouds of distrust and disbelief over the scientific community. That's why climate scientists say calls for such debates are disconcerting: According to the Trump administration, satellite observations, ground measurements, field research, and deeply scrutinized results -- gathered over decades and from across the globe -- simply aren't sufficiently convincing.
In the interview with Reuters, Pruitt called for a "robust discussion" about climate change, though he didn't explain how the scientists participating in that discussion would be chosen.
Asked if the debate should be televised, Pruitt told Reuters: "I think so. I think so. I mean, I don’t know yet, but you want this to be open to the world. You want this to be on full display. I think the American people would be very interested in consuming that. I think they deserve it."
The TV debate would likely build on or coincide with the Trump administration's plans to host so-called "red team, blue team" debates on climate science.
Pruitt, who denies that carbon dioxide is the main cause of global warming (it is), would reportedly help pick the experts. He's floated the idea in recent weeks, saying such discussions would be modeled on processes used for evaluating military battle plans and ways that spacecraft engineers test critical systems or investigate accidents.
Many climate scientists said they see this plan as a direct assault on the scientific process. Looping in non-experts to debate climate science would be like asking a person who likes looking at the stars to go head-to-head with actual astronomers and physicists.
"It's one thing to respond to legitimate scientific criticism, quite another to refute unconstrained nonsense," Kate Marvel, a scientist at NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies in New York, previously told Mashable.
'Succession' Season 4, episode 4: What does Shiv's pregnancy actually mean?The unexpected joy of not knowing when your package will be deliveredStrong and Wise Mothers; No Children, Please by Lorin SteinFoldable devices we could see in 2023'Wordle' today: Here's the answer, hints for April 19“Lit It Crowd” Lousy with Parisians by Lorin Stein'Wordle' today: Here's the answer, hints for April 19J.K. Rowling's to release first children's story since Harry PotterHilarious meme demands to know what's preventing men from looking like thisStrong and Wise Mothers; No Children, Please by Lorin SteinBrand tweets about being an antiThe Outcasts of W. Eugene Smith’s Jazz LoftMemo to 'The Mandalorian': This is the way (to fix the show)Facebook role play groups offer a mundane escape from the pandemicWhat Earth was like last time CO2 levels were as high as todayStaff Picks: Cycling, Skiing, and an Island of Solitude by The Paris ReviewYouTube pledges $1 million toward police reformHow doctors' receptionists really feel about their notorious TikTok reputationGeoff Dyer on 'Otherwise Known as the Human Condition' by Evan RatliffJohn Jeremiah Sullivan Wins Prize, Does Paris Review Proud by Lorin Stein Best space heater deal: Save up to 36% on Dyson, Vornado, Honeywell models, and more NYT Strands hints, answers for October 15 Today's Hurdle hints and answers for October 16 Best gaming laptop deal: Save over $100 on Logitech G915 TKL Best Amazon deals of the day: Samsung Galaxy Watch 6, Galaxy Ring, AeroGarden Harvest, and more Best Nespresso deal: Save $64 on the Nespresso Vertuo Best Dyson deal: Get a refurbished Airwrap or Airstrait for under $250 NYT mini crossword answers for October 17 Best poseable skeleton deals: Spook up your space with poseable skeleton deals Best camera deal: Get the DJI Osmo Action 3 camera for $199 at Amazon 23andMe data breach settlement could give up to $10K to victims Belgium vs. France 2024 livestream: Watch UEFA Nations League for free Why is TikTok obsessed with the winter arc? Best robot vacuum deal: Save $160 on theEufy X10 Pro Omni robot vacuum The Bose QuietComfort Ultra headphones are back at their record Canadiens vs. Penguins 2024 livestream: How to watch NHL for free Instagram launches profile cards to share your profile with a QR code What does WLW mean? Best gaming headset deal: Save $20 on Gtheos Gaming Headset Amazon accidentally unveils Colorsoft, the first color Kindle
1.6992s , 10137.3125 kb
Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【Watch When the Camellia Blooms Online】,Information Information Network