Boston on Bayo (2025)Wednesday joined the still small, but growing, number of U.S. cities that have for the most part banned city officials' use of facial-recognition technology.
The ordinance, sponsored by Councilor Michelle Wu and Councilor Ricardo Arroyo, passed by a unanimous vote according to Councilor Wu. The new measure prohibits both the city of Boston and any official in the city of Boston from using "face surveillance" and "information derived from a face surveillance system."
There are, importantly, a few key exceptions. One such exception, allowing city employees to still use technology like Face ID to unlock their personal smartphones, is uncontroversial. Another, allowing law enforcement to "[use] evidence relating to the investigation of a specific crime that may have been generated from a face surveillance system, so long as such evidence was not generated by or at the request of Boston or any Boston official" could perhaps cause controversy down the road.
It is not impossible to imagine, as facial-recognition technology becomes cheaper and more widely accessible, citizen groups (such as those today who willingly turn their Amazon Ring videos over to police every time they see a "suspicious person") running their own facial-recognition scans and forwarding that information to police on their own accord. As currently written — as long as there was no official agreement between law enforcement and these groups, and a specific crime was being investigated — it appears police would be able to act on this problematic information.
Still, the measure broadly restricts what officials can and can't do with the powerful, but extremely flawed, technology. The city can neither run its own system, nor contract out with a third party to do so in its stead. What's more, any data gathered in violation of the ordinance "shall be considered unlawfully obtained and shall be deleted upon discovery[.]"
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
Notably, this vote comes on the same day as a complaint filed by the ACLU following the wrongful arrest of Robert Williams, a Black resident of Detroit, based on faulty facial-recognition tech. Williams, and the unnamed thief police were after, are both Black men. The facial-recognition software used by Detroit police couldn't tell them apart, and incorrectly pegged Williams as the criminal.
A 2019 federal study confirmed that facial-recognition tech misidentifies Black people, the young, women, and the elderly at rates higher than that of white men.
"I never thought I'd have to explain to my daughters why daddy got arrested," Williams writes in the Washington Post. "How does one explain to two little girls that a computer got it wrong, but the police listened to it anyway?"
SEE ALSO: Congressman calls out Amazon's 'performative' facial-recognition moratorium
Boston is the second largest city, after San Francisco, to mostly ban the official use of facial-recognition tech. The measure goes into effect immediately, and follows on corporate pledges of varying legitimacy to pause the sale of facial-recognition tech to law enforcement. However, as more and more cities follow San Francisco's, Oakland's, and Berkeley's (among others) lead, the sincerity of those pledges becomes less and less significant.
Good news, it seems, is still possible.
Topics Cybersecurity Facial Recognition Privacy
Trump's cyber advisor didn't know about SignalYouTube is removing North Korean content and no one knows why10 original songs cut from 'La La Land' for who knows whyLofree's beautiful new keyboard is inspired by classic typewritersJ.K. Rowling fights back as Donald Trump reinstates antiChina will make it rain over an area 1.7 times the size of FranceSamsung Galaxy S8 will reportedly launch in April, and LG G6 will suffer for itJon Stewart tells Tom Brokaw that social media has 'democratized abuse'10 original songs cut from 'La La Land' for who knows whyYouTube is removing North Korean content and no one knows whyThis is what a computer thinks rum should taste likeWomen's March protestor seeks help on Facebook to find 'equality bae'Oscar nominees: Here's the full listMeet the new FCC chairman, harbinger of doom for net neutralityOscars 2017: It's a good time to be a nerdThis Redditor's bizarre story about England is trolling at its very finestEwan McGregor and Piers Morgan feud on Twitter over Women's MarchMeryl Streep is celebrating her Oscar nomination with a pitchNew patent hints at a customizable Apple WatchMeet the new FCC chairman, harbinger of doom for net neutrality Staff Picks: David Grossman, Donald Barthelme, Derren Brown, and More Samsung Black Friday TV deals 2023: $1,000 off 85 Best indoor pizza oven deal: $200 off the Breville Pizza Oven When “Caca How John King’s String Quartet Fuses Western and Arabic Music What is post The internet says winter will be bad. Here's what the science says. 'Quordle' today: See each 'Quordle' answer and hints for November 13, 2023 One Way Out: Memories of the Allman Brothers (And My Mailman) Reimagining Doestoevky’s “White Nights” As a Building Best deals of the day Dec. 7: Roomba i3+ Evo, Fire TV Omni Series, and Paramount+ subscriptions A Pink Guggenheim? Frank Lloyd Wright Nearly Made It So Staff Picks: Alec Wilkinson, Ali Smith, Long Ling, and More Happy Dark: Maren Karlson’s Cheery Nightmare Worlds Tesla might sue Cybertruck resellers Literary Architecture by Sadie Stein Kids everywhere are ruining their parents' Spotify Wrapped Once I Had This Dream: Gretchen Scherer’s Crumbling Chateaux Mother Monster: “Mommie Dearest,” “Book of Mutter,” and Unhappy Moms NYT's The Mini crossword answers for November 12
2.3592s , 8229.234375 kb
Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【Bayo (2025)】,Information Information Network