LONDON -- The eroticism in the victorian erasheer number of people we now encounter in the digital space on a daily basis is, to me, overwhelming.
As someone whose friends and family are spread around the globe, I am grateful for the possibilities that social media affords -- I FaceTime my mom everyday and participate in an ongoing multi-platform discussion on the (many) merits of falafels with my college roommate who now lives 3,500 miles away.
But there's a point when the internet's many communication channels stop being useful and become an extrovert's tool for torturing the introvert.
SEE ALSO: This ramen joint is an introverted foodie's paradiseLet me elaborate. When I receive a Facebook message, text, email etc., I meet the notification with a degree of anxiety and dread. It's wonderful to hear from friends and family, but depending on the sender, it seems that a ticking bomb comes attached to the message. If I don't reply within some unknown allotment of time, the bomb will go off, and I will have been complicit in the ultimate social atrocity.
My palms grow sweaty.
via GIPHY
In my mind, I buy myself time from the obligation of responding until I open the message. "Oh, well she hasn't read it yet" somehow absolves you from your crime -- for a period. But I ask, why is that better? Confession: I know you've sent it, and I acknowledge that you may have your own anxieties in awaiting my response -- I'm choosing to ignore it. I feel guilt, but also a horrible glee because why should you dictate my life?
You are stealing my precious people juice with your expectations.
via GIPHY
At this point, I'm refusing to even read a message out of fear that I won't have the the time -- or people juice -- to craft an adequate response to its contents within whatever arbitrary time period is socially acceptable. I'm on the verge of developing resentment towards a perfectly friendly offer to catchup over drinks on a Friday night, or damaging a professional relationship by ignoring the sender. I feel guilty, and I feel stressed by the accumulation of digital clutter in both my personal and work life that have human expectations on the other end.
This needs to stop, and the answer does not lie in fueling the instant gratification many have come to crave and even expect in the evolving mass addiction spawned by social media
via GIPHY
Part of this sense of anxiety stems from the fact that there is no clear-cut communication etiquette for instant messaging platforms, and different people have different expectations. When I said that extroverts torture introverts using social media, I should clarify that I find it unlikely that the extrovert views the exchange in those terms. However, providing people who enjoy constant human interaction with a direct channel to people who don't at times feels, well, sadistic. Don't get me wrong --introverts derive plenty of use from the internet. But if you remove the social distance allowed by the web and insist on immediacy, the largeness of social networks becomes potentially terrifying to the solitarily inclined.
Furthermore, in the digital space we lose the subtleties of body language and inflection present in face-to-face conversations -- an emoji only goes so far, and studies show people tend to interpret the expressions in drastically different ways. For the more introspective communicator, crafting an appropriate and thoughtful reply may be more of a priority than speed -- it isn't fair to disregard this profound variation in personality.
The introvert faces an excruciating dilemma here: do they risk violating social codes, or betray their very identity?
A small aside: the workplace presents a different conundrum altogether when we venture into the protocol of professionalism. Addressing the finer points of email decorum and subsidiary communication tools in the office would warrant another piece altogether, so for now suffice to say that France has the right idea.
When you've known a person for a period of time and become familiar with their unique style of communicating, the anxiety lessens. My closest friends are very aware that lack of an immediate reaction or a simple 'thumbs up' reply is not a reflection of how I value them as individuals. Things start to get hairy when we enter the world of acquaintances, love interests, and fringe members of our social circles. The introvert faces an excruciating dilemma here: do they risk violating social codes, or betray their very identity?
via GIPHY
It isn't just the introvert that serves to lose out here, though. Any individual that doesn't wish to be enslaved to a screen is impacted. Having the ability to communicate instantly certainly has vast benefits, but there is no line drawn as to where it ends. Maybe I've been watching too much Black Mirror, but walking through a city and observing every other head bent towards a screen has unnerving implications for our future. Granted, instant messaging is only a part of it, but I fear we risk feeding the technology addiction by pandering to this urgency in replying instantaneously.
A final thought in the interest of fairness: I will concede that at times I am an absolute pain in the ass -- in instances that warrant a quick reply, sometimes I could do better.
To that I say, I am truly sorry. And also, there is an archaic device known as a telephone where you can reach me in a prompt manner.
via GIPHY
Kanye West is buying Parler, the controversial 'free speech' social networkEnglish soccer team solves incredible 'spaceburger' riddleAlfie the alpaca goes on the cutest adventuresThe small corner of Instagram dedicated to temporary wallpaper is uncommonly magicalThe flat stomach meme will probably just make you hungryMeta's VR legs aren't real and can't hurt youDr. Dre, a big USC donor, says his daughter got into USC 'on her own'Microsoft gets in on DALLPorn site CamSoda will now let you create your own digital cam girl avatarThese $315 denim panties are deeply upsettingMeta's VR legs aren't real and can't hurt you'Quordle' today: See each 'Quordle' answer and hints for October 13What are Facebook Stars, and should you give them?Wordle today: Here's the answer, hints for October 17Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson and more honor Robbie ColtraneMicrosoft Office to be renamed Microsoft 365Wordle today: Here's the answer, hints for October 16The metaverse's Horizon Worlds is failing Mark Zuckerberg's expectationsDaniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson and more honor Robbie ColtranePolestar 3 is a luxury electric SUV with tons of tech A Hall of Mirrors by Gary Indiana Climate activists protested Rex Tillerson’s nomination in T. Rex costumes Love Songs: “I Want to Be Your Man” by Elena Saavedra Buckley Wordle today: The answer and hints for January 28 My Boyfriend Nietzsche and a Boy Like a Baked Alaska by The Paris Review Gaddis/Markson: Two Letters by William Gaddis and David Markson Yes, ChatGPT got lazier. But OpenAI finally has a fix. Love Songs: “Water Sign” by Addie E. Citchens Love Songs: “Up in Hudson” by Camille Jacobson Fake Biden robocall creator suspended from voice AI company ElevenLabs Love Songs: “Slow Show” by Nathan Goldman Love Songs: “Mississippi” by Sophie Haigney Elon Musk's SpaceX absolutely needs its satellite internet business to work Amazon Fire Tablet Deal: $70 off the Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus Lovers sale: 30% off sex toys plus a free Womanizer vibrator Love Songs: “She Will Be Loved”? by Clare Sestanovich Love Songs: “I’m Your Man” by Laurie Stone Love Songs: “This Must Be the Place (Naive Melody)” by David S. Wallace Bluetooth sex toys and VR: how people are having sex in virtual reality SpaceX's Saturday rocket launch is a big freaking deal
3.0749s , 10192.4140625 kb
Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【eroticism in the victorian era】,Information Information Network