How991 Archivesyou take your news: Plain or with a splash of interpretation?
Turns out, your answer is reasonably correlated to who you voted for. A new survey by the Pew Research Center asked supporters of Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton how news should be presented.
The two options: The facts with and without interpretation.
Trump supporters favored news without interpretation by two-to-one. Clinton supporters were split 50/50.
Pew researchers Michael Barthel and Jeffrey Gottfried noted that these numbers might be a little skewed considering the survey was taken in the midst of the election.
"This may be linked to a perception among Republicans that coverage of their candidate had been too tough. Among Republicans, 46% thought coverage of Trump had been too tough, while only three-in-ten Democrats thought the same of coverage of Clinton, according to Pew Research Center’s mid-September survey," Barthel and Gottfried wrote.
Together, the people surveyed ended up favoring the presentation of facts without interpretation (59%) to facts with interpretation (40%).
Opposition to interpretation did not mean that the public expects journalists to just serve as stenographers. Pew's survey found that people still want fact checking, with 81% of respondents seeing the act as a major or minor responsibility of journalists.
"Since a majority prefer the news media to avoid interpretation, the public may be more likely to approve of the news media analyzing public figures’ statements when presented as fact-checking – using facts to either verify a piece of information or correct a piece of misinformation – rather than as analysis or commentary," Barthel and Gottfried wrote.
Topics Donald Trump Elections
iOS 17 Siri can read Safari articles for you: 5 other new things it can doThe gold cube marketing stunt is dumb, but the memes are greatBeware the Mineshaft of BooksAt the Beijing 2022 Winter Olympics, a robot is making the drinksGrowing Up With Obsessive30 incredible writers pen empowering essays of singlehood in 'Unattached'The Plum Tree on West 83rd StreetAnnouncing the Winners of Our #ReadEverywhere ContestBeware the Mineshaft of Books'That's Not My Name' goes viral on TikTokHow young women are facilitating and challenging feminist discourse on TikTokNick Sousanis on How Comics Help Us Make ConnectionsGrowing Up With Obsessive8 burning 'Only Murders in the Building' questions ahead of the finaleJumping ThroughNick Sousanis on How Comics Help Us Make ConnectionsArtist Rebecca Bird Sketches Donald Judd‘s Loft Building'Quordle' today: See each 'Quordle' answer and hints for September 26, 2023The Plum Tree on West 83rd Street#ReadEverywhere, All Summer Long Corpsing: On Sex, Death, and Inappropriate Laughter by Nuar Alsadir Vivian Gornick Will Receive Our 2023 Hadada Award by The Paris Review On Penumbra, Caio Fernando Abreu, and Alain Mabanckou by The Paris Review Cambridge Diary, 2014 by J. D. Daniels Notes from Iran by Nilo Tabrizy Clipboard, 2022 by Jesse Ball Twilight Zone Dispatch: The Last Stop and the Book of Revelation by Nicolette Polek If Kim Novak Were to Die: A Conversation with Patrizia Cavalli by Annalena Benini Returning to Salman Rushdie’s Haroun by The Paris Review On Hannah Black’s Pandemic Novella, Barthelme, and Pessoa by The Paris Review Love, Loosha by Lucia Berlin and Kenward Elmslie Beautiful Losers: On Leonard Cohen by Nell Zink Find My Friends by Sophie Haigney Michelle de Kretser and David Orr Recommend; Our Editors Remember Hilary Mantel by The Paris Review Genres for War: Writers in Ukraine on Literature by Zarina Zabrisky Acte Gratuit by Alice Blackhurst Postcards from Ellsworth by Rebecca Bengal Diary, 2001 by Nell Zink For the Record, the Review Has Not Abolished Fiction by The Paris Review A Laborer Called a Writer: On Leonard Cohen by Carina del Valle Schorske
1.7057s , 10113.2109375 kb
Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【1991 Archives】,Information Information Network