You can Watch Climax Onlinefind pretty much anything on Wikipedia. The reason the internet encyclopedia is such a wealth of information is largely due to it being an open collaboration platform where anyone can contribute. However, in one rare instance, the Wikimedia Foundation, the nonprofit that runs Wikipedia, had to step in and remove content from the site.
A recent studyby Comparitech, a consumer tech website, compiled and analyzed transparency report data from Facebook, Google, Twitter, Microsoft, and Wikimedia. For years now, as distrust in major tech companies has risen, these organizations have released transparency reports in an effort to be more open and honest with the public. These reports typically include information like user data requests and content takedowns from governments and copyright removals under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA).
Comparitech discovered in its study that since Wikimedia started tracking this information in 2012, it has only granted a single non-DMCA content takedown request.
Mashable reached out to the Wikimedia Foundation to find out more about this request, which originated from Ukraine in 2014, and why it was granted.
According to Wikimedia, a blogger visiting Burma/Myanmar posted a redacted photo of his visa on his website. Somehow, a version of his visa picture without his personal information removed ended up on an English Wikipedia article concerning the country’s visa policy.
“He wrote to us, asking to remove the photo,” wrote Wikimedia. “Given the nature of the information and the circumstances of how it was exposed, we took the image down.”
“Generally speaking, the reason the Foundation gets relatively few takedown requests is because the volunteer editor community is effective at ensuring content meets the site's standards — including those around licensing and sourcing,” a Wikimedia Foundation spokesperson told us.
Compared to the other major tech companies included in this report, it’s true that Wikimedia, by far, receives the least takedown requests. According to the study, since it began releasing its transparency report in 2013, Facebook has received more than 70,000 takedown requests from India alone. Russia has sent Google more than 61,000 takedown requests since 2009.
For comparison, the country that’s requested the most Wikipedia takedowns, the United States, has only 797 requests over the 6 years that Wikimedia has released its transparency reports.
However, requests from courts and governments to take down content from Wikipedia are rising. The Comparitech analysis reveals that in 2017, Wikimedia saw a 144 percent increase in takedown requests. In 2018, the organization received 880 content takedown requests, the most it's received yet.
Previous：The Ghost of the Feast
Pity the Landlord
Google is developing a censored news app for China
Nintendo's NES Classic Edition was the top
Keep Austin weird: Ride
Difficult People
Facebook’s new 'Playable Ads' let you try mobile game demos right in your newsfeed
iHeartRadio is using AI to smooth transitions between tracks
Why you should be skeptical of tools to fight smartphone addiction
Knicks vs. Pacers 2025 livestream: Watch Game 5 of NBA playoffs for free
Confused snake gets caught in a loop while trying to shed its skin
Art for Earth’s Sake
QAnon conspiracy blew up because of a bigger internet problem
Chrissy Teigen on Splash Mountain captures the new mom Disneyland struggles
The Away Mode Alexa app is a humorous attempt to stop burglars
Rippling Trumpism
Internet helps Ayesha Curry cook up a Crying Jordan cake
LeBron avoids subtlety by throwing shade with a new post
Woman finds 16
No Overtime at the Boner Factory
Artist whittles wood into food and fools us all
TikTok's nostalgiaZoom makes its 'AI Companion' available to paid customers at no additional costTikTok's most influential creators now feature on one big influential listEmma, Cover to Cover by Dan PiepenbringWordle today: Here's the answer and hints for September 5Perfumed hand sanitizer is the worst, so let's stop using itThe Morning News Roundup for November 6, 2014Best Labor Day sales 2023: Get these straggler deals before they're gone'Only Murders in the Building' Season 3: Episode 6 ignored its biggest clueVeterans Day by Sadie SteinHow the internet paid tribute to the late Jimmy BuffettTonight’s Sleep Aid: “Congressional Districting in Iowa”Wordle today: Here's the answer and hints for September 3Can watching ethical porn help improve our sexual body image? Labor Day Apple deals 2023: Save on AirPods, iPads, and moreThe Morning News Roundup for November 20, 2014A Conversation About “Our Secret Life in the Movies”How to Repair ParchmentAnother Evening Gone by Sadie SteinWhy I Loved Wayne Newton’s “The Entertainer” Netflix is getting blasted for using AI art in an anime instead of hiring artists What are Facebooks new comment moderation tool updates? WhatsApp is letting users post voice notes as statuses Apple may be working on iPhone Ultra 'The Last of Us' episode 4: Who is Kathleen? The loss of Twitter's free API tier is a blow to activists and researchers. Elon Musk locked his Twitter account and went private. Here's why. Google Bard: Everything we know about the ChatGPT rival Dominance and submission: a guide to Dom/sub dynamics Vivo's X90 flagship phones charge to 50 percent in 8 minutes Wordle today: Here's the answer, hints for February 3 Dude pranks San Francisco by placing AirPod stickers all over the city George Kent's blue Nalgene was the real star of the impeachment hearing Dunkin is finally tossing out styrofoam cups for good Inside Quinn, a new site for audio erotica Chrissy Teigen calls out Donald Trump Jr.'s suspiciously amazing book sales Cute friendship alert: Dog watches over abandoned baby giraffe PayPal will no longer support Pornhub payments Trump's unexpected hospital trip has Twitter conspiracies in overdrive Wordle today: Here's the answer, hints for February 7
2.0245s , 10121.1875 kb
Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【Watch Climax Online】,Information Information Network