Google's just made a rather subtle change to its image search — but Caged Womenone that will have big repercussions for copyright.
Announced on Thursday on Twitter, the company has removed the "view image" button from image search, which will make it trickier to save copyrighted images directly.
SEE ALSO: Google's fast-loading AMP pages are coming to GmailOnce a direct link to a high resolution version of your chosen image, the "view image" button was a concern for photographers, publishers and stock image sites alike, as it allowed people to access a high res version of the image without visiting the source site.
With Google's elimination of the tool, you'll still be able to visit the source of the image with the remaining "visit" button, but it's this additional step that's hopefully meant to make people less likely to steal copyrighted material — seeing images in their original context could be a red flag for users.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
This tiny, but significant change notably comes in the wake of Google's new multi-year global licensing partnership with Getty Images, enabling Google to use Getty's content within its various products and services.
The partnership was developed after Getty filed a complaint against Google in 2016, accusing the company of anti-competitive practices within Google Images and "distorting search results in favour of its own services" — creating less of a need to visit source stock websites likes Getty to download the original image.
"Because image consumption [in Google Images] is immediate, once an image is displayed in high-resolution, large format, there is little impetus to view the image on the original source site," Getty's press statement read.
Whether simply removing a button will significantly curb copyright infringement within Google Images remains to be seen. But it's a start.
Topics Google
Majority of women declined sex due to body insecurities, dating app findsObject Lesson by Sadie SteinNYT's The Mini crossword answers for October 12Trumpet just became the first Bloodhound to ever win the Westminster Dog ShowWaiting in the Sky: 8 Paintings by Barbara TakenagaReciting Sagas in the Westfjords of IcelandToday in TwentyWhy “Peblum” Is a Decidedly Different Take on the Toga EpicYou Didn’t Know You Wanted It, But … Knausgaard in LegosOn Morbid SensitivityQAnon influencers are now reportedly defrauding their followers via cryptocurrency scamsBest Buy holiday kickoff event: PostWriters Are Always Spies and Voyeurs, TooWho Hears the Hum, and Why?Creepiest Pop Song Ever? Billy Jay Kramer’s “Little Children”Move over Bing Image Creator! Google announces new AI image generation toolIn Praise of the Ugly CryMalthusian Flotsam and Unspeakable Jetsam, and Other News by Dan PiepenbringNGL: the app that lets you share anonymous thoughts with mutuals“The Throwback Special” Is “2016’s First Great Book” I Thought My Dad Had No More Secrets to Tell, But... Why “Fat City” Is the Best (And Bleakest) Boxing Movie of All Rick Alverson Discusses His New Film “Entertainment” English Has Only Three Dedicated Smell Words—We Need More Not “Purple Rain,” But “Blue Rain With a Little Red in It” In Sixteenth Tonight: Rowan Ricardo Phillips at McNally Jackson How The Old Farmer’s Almanac Predicted the Information Age Lock in discounted Hulu prices by Oct. 11 before the price increase Meta's AI dating coach Carter is a prude, apparently Lena Dunham on Mary Karr’s “The Liars’ Club” The Altars in Mitla: Visiting Mexico on Dia de los Muertos Staff Picks: Mary Beard, David Bowie, M.F.K. Fisher Welcome to My Basketball Life Doormat, or, A Story of Charity Season Kilroy Is Still Here: Soldiers, Graffiti, and Latrinalia Tuesday: Ben Lerner and Thomas Demand at MoMA Book Store 'Fair Play' review: Does this corporate thriller live up to the hype? Prank Idea: Abbots Bromley Horn Dance W. Eugene Smith’s Obsessive, Quixotic Documentary Work
2.3992s , 8200.78125 kb
Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【Caged Women】,Information Information Network