Donald Trump gave an interview over the weekend in which he pretty much asked why the Civil War was fought. (The eroticism cowardice apathyanswer, of course, is mainly slavery.)
Trump was widely criticized and mocked for the gaffe, which seemed to bely (yet again) a shocking level of ignorance about American history for someone serving as president of the United States of America.
But it turns out Trump has some history with revisionist Civil War history.
SEE ALSO: Trump quote of the day: 'Why was there the Civil War?'Back in 2009, Trump bought a golf course in Virginia. He renovated it and rebranded it as one of his "Trump golf" clubs. Between the 14th and 15th holes, according to a New York Timesreport from November 2015, Trump had a flag pole, stone surface and plaque built to commemorate something called "The River of Blood."
Ooooh! "The River of Blood"!? Sounds intriguing. What's the deal?
"Many great American soldiers, both of the North and South, died at this spot," the plaque read, per the Times. "The casualties were so great that the water would turn red and thus became known as 'The River of Blood.'"
"It is my great honor to have preserved this important section of the Potomac River!" reportedly read a second inscription above Trump's name.
The takeaway, if you take all that at face value: Trump "preserved" a historic section of the Potomac River, one that was a famous and brutal Civil War site that became known by a dramatic nickname, "The River of Blood."
Except here's the problem: The Timescalled at least one local history expert who who had no idea what Trump was talking about.
"No. Uh-uh. No way. Nothing like that ever happened there," said Richard Gillespie, executive director of the Mosby Heritage Area Association, which educates about and preserves the history of the region that includes Trump's golf course.
The Timesthen called Trump back for more explanation. He did not exactly provide receipts. He said he got the information on the plaque from "my people." Here are a couple quotes from Trump, who is now president of the United States, defending his course's "River of Blood" plaque.
On the site itself: "That was a prime site for river crossings. So, if people are crossing the river, and you happen to be in a civil war, I would say that people were shot — a lot of them."
On local historians debunking his plaque: "How would they know? Were they there?"
On the Timesasking questions: "Write your story the way you want to write it. You don’t have to talk to anybody. It doesn’t make any difference. But many people were shot. It makes sense."
The mental contortions required to parse these arguments will make you weep.
Some people were maybe shot at a river crossing, so now we just name it "The River of Blood" 150 years later? Historians, whose profession is studying history, have no credence if they weren't alive centuries ago to witness that history? Simply saying "it makes sense" is a valid rebuttal for what appears to be a fabricated historical site?
*Rubs temples
*That sort of disjointed thinking and obtuse insistence was weird enough when Trump was seen as little more than a reality TV star and sideshow in the Republican primary.
But now that he's president -- and now that his latest Civil War gaffe prompted this trip down memory lane -- it's something else entirely. Something much stranger, and something much more sinister.
Topics Donald Trump Politics
There's now a plaque to commemorate where Ian McKellen ate a potatoSteve Aoki's 'Ghost In The Shell' remix is getting ripped apart by fansEdward Snowden weighs in on WikiLeaks CIA dumpNow anyone can order a Lyft for someone else without a Lyft accountThe internet is very upset about the mistake on Trump's green #MAGA hatsGuy replaces sister's goldfish with baby carrots to test her commitment to pet ownershipBest headphones deal: Save over $20 on Soundcore P30i earbudsAirbnb CEO will pull a Zuckerberg, travel the worldAndroid may soon beat Windows as the world's most popular OSPatagonia and Google look to defend public lands with stunning VR film seriesFacebook reports the BBC to police for sending sexualised images of childrenHow to participate in the Women's Strike if you can't skip workThere's a Nokia 3310 with a gold Putin face on it waiting for youDonald TrumpWhat would animals say if tech let them talk? Nothing good, probably.IMDb introduces 'F' rating to highlight femaleSee Darren Criss menace Grant Gustin and Melissa Benoist in 'The Flash' musical episodeSmartphones are only a luxury if you have moneySonos puts your sound bar where it belongs, under your TVSome people aren't cool with having less sexist pedestrian traffic lights, go figure Best GoPro deal: Get the GoPro Max for under $400 at Amazon This giant offshore wind farm will be the largest in the U.S. The most streamed TV shows of 2023 may surprise you 'Eternal You' reveals how AI chatbots aim to resurrect the dead Dear Jean Pierre by David Wojnarowicz Watch Jessica Laser Read “Kings” at the Paris Review Offices by The Paris Review Fireworks: On Kenneth Anger and The Legend of Zelda by The Paris Review Cooking with Elizabeth David by Valerie Stivers Best smart tracker deal: The Samsung Galaxy SmartTag2 tracker is under $22 at Amaon Sentences We Loved This Summer by The Paris Review This 'GOT' star teamed up with Google to capture Greenland's melting ice @ErasTourUpdates: Taylor Swift in Philadelphia by Jake Nevins NYT's The Mini crossword answers for January 31 ChatGPT now lets you pull other GPTs into the chat A Summer Dispatch from the Review’s Poetry Editor by Srikanth Reddy How 21 kids could keep climate websites from going completely dark Apple Vision Pro unboxing: Watch MKBHD show us what's inside Trump’s political appointees will vet EPA’s scientific work before release NASA experiments show how astronaut’s genes changed in space August 27–September 4: What the Review’s Staff Is Doing Next Week by The Paris Review
1.8715s , 10193.9140625 kb
Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【eroticism cowardice apathy】,Information Information Network