【A Thought of Ecstasy】

Researchers from the University of California,A Thought of Ecstasy Santa Barbara have developed a new, cheaper method for possible home COVID-19 testing that involves a smartphone camera and app.

The new testing system, which is the subject of a research paper printed in the journal JAMA Network Open, uses some basic lab equipment and the app Bacticount to detect possible pathogens in a person's saliva. To use it, you load your saliva sample into a test kit sitting on a hot plate. You then add in a specific reactive solution that amplifies viral RNA that might be in that spit, similar to the solution process that current at-home COVID tests use.

This specific process is called “Loop-mediated Isothermal Amplification,” or LAMP for short.

Mashable Light Speed Want more out-of-this world tech, space and science stories? Sign up for Mashable's weekly Light Speed newsletter. By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!

The sample would go inside the box on the left, where an LED would shine. Credit: University of California, Santa Barbara

Once any potential viral RNA is amplified, you place a cardboard box with an LED light over the top. Then, a smartphone's camera can look into the LED-lit box, where it should be able to see any color reactions that indicate the presence of COVID-19. If a viral load is present, the solution should create a bright red light. If the viral load is larger, aka more contagious, the red light should appear quicker. The app will estimate your viral load based on how quickly that light appears and registers.

According to Gizmodo, the cost of using this new test setup would be "less than $100, plus the price of the smartphone you’d need to run the app." For each subsequent test, which would presumably require a new test kit, you'd be out about $7 – a bargain compared to the hundreds that insurance companies have been charging for certain PCR and rapid tests.

SEE ALSO: Here's how to get free COVID tests delivered to your door right now

The researchers say this testing method could have the same accuracy rate as a PCR test, and being able to conduct the test at home could potentially allow for much quicker results than a PCR test taken at a doctor's office that handles hundreds of samples a day. However, it is important to note that this study did have a relatively small sample size of 50 people, so further research will be needed before it can be implemented widely.

The test kit was originally designed for "resource-limited settings," but its head researcher told Gizmodo that it could be easily adapted for home testing as well. The only caveat is that the Bacticount app is currently only compatible with the Samsung Galaxy S9 due to its specific camera calibrations. This could change in the future as research continues, and allow for more smartphone cameras to tap into the testing technology.

Topics COVID-19

• Tech
• Entertainment
• Social Good
• Life
• Deals
• Games
• Science
• Digital Culture

• Why Building a Gaming PC Right Now is a Bad Idea, Part 1: Expensive DDR4 Memory
• 'The Crown' reveals first look at Princess Diana's wedding dress
• Scaramucci bought his way into the movie Trump got cut from
• Twitter is developing a new misinfo moderation tool called Birdwatch
• Wordle today: The answer and hints for April 14, 2025
• Netflix Gift Guide 2020: Best gifts to buy for your friend
• Slack problems: Messages not sending, completely down for some users
• 'Raised by Wolves' and Ridley Scott's milk obsession, explained
• Best Sony headphones deal: Over $100 off Sony XM5 headphones
• Donald Trump, famous for firing people on TV, is actually terrible at firing people

• Wordle today: The answer and hints for January 28, 2025
• Best Hulu deals and bundles: Best streaming deals in January 2025
• Trump's foreign aid freeze halts funding for digital diplomacy bureau
• NYT Strands hints, answers for January 25
• Philadelphia 76ers vs. Chicago Bulls 2025 livestream: Watch NBA online
• DeepSeek AI: How to try DeepSeek R1 right now
• Swifties for Kamala: How Taylor Swift fans are creating a new blueprint for political organizing
• Best Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra deal: Save $400 at Best Buy
• Here's what DeepSeek AI does better than OpenAI's ChatGPT
• Ghost sightings went unsolved. A scientist just explained them.

• Ryzen 5 1600X vs. 1600: Which should you buy?
• 'Song Exploder' review: Netflix series is for passionate superfans
• Regal Cinemas owner confirms it's weighing the closure of US locations
• 'Plandids' are the Instagram trend of the moment and you've defo already posted one
• What cracked the Milky Way's giant cosmic bone? Scientists think they know.
• Yes, there's a guy dedicated solely to coming up with weird Donald Trump bets
• 14 best tweets of the week, including a Jokerfied Watto, smack barm, and pey wet
• 'SNL' musical guest Morgan Wallen dropped over COVID concerns
• The Baffler’s May Day Round Up
• This tortoise called Herman is BFFs with a bread version of himself

• Fritz vs. Ruud 2025 livestream: Watch Madrid Open for free
• The Mooch was fooled by a fake Reince Priebus, and boy these emails are embarrassing
• NASA's new space toilet is successfully launched into space
• Tesla finally launches two
• Time to Unite
• Facebook will temporarily ban political ads after the election
• The best podcasting apps on iOS in 2020
• These six headphones could make the perfect holiday gift
• Exceptionally rare radio sources detected in the distant universe
• Ava DuVernay on streaming, empathy, and Lenovo's New Realities VR